Three businesses that work today.
We analyse them the way an investor would: what it costs to start, where the demand comes from and what can go wrong. No income promises.
We analyse them the way an investor would: what it costs to start, where the demand comes from and what can go wrong. No income promises.
A business only makes the list if customers already pay to solve the problem. If demand cannot be checked today, it is not on the list.
Entry cost, margin, recurring revenue and the risk that technology or regulation changes. All three businesses are measured against the same limits.
Every recommendation ends in something concrete to do this week, not in an idea. The rest gets adjusted with the first customers.
Most lists of profitable businesses are written to win a click. They promise income, skip the costs and forget that most projects fail for the same reason: starting without customers.
We do the opposite. A few businesses, analysed from the inside, with what it takes to start, what usually goes wrong and why they make sense now. If a year from now they no longer do, they come off the list.
The businesses
Chosen for verifiable demand, an affordable entry cost and the chance to bill every month. None of them is easy money: all three require learning a trade.
Setting up assistants, agents and automated workflows that take repetitive work off small firms: customer service, bookings, quotes and invoices.
Producing videos, product photos and social ads with generative tools such as Higgsfield, for a fraction of the cost of a shoot.
Adding storage to homes and businesses that already have solar panels, and looking after it. It is the fastest growing part of self-consumption.
Four filters, always in the same order. A business that fails one does not reach the next.
Customers who already pay today to solve the problem. We check live ads, quotes being requested and companies already billing in the sector.
What it costs to reach the first customer: tools, training, permits and months without income. If you have to borrow to start, it is out.
What is left after costs, and whether the customer pays again the following month. We prefer small repeated fees to large one off sales.
What could break it: a regulation, a tool that raises its price, a large competitor. And what can be done if it happens.
None of the three needs premises or a large investment at the start. They do need time, learning the trade and going out to find the first customers.
Data
Three public figures that explain the choice. They are not income forecasts: they describe the demand each business starts from.
Sources: INE (Spanish Statistics Office), ICT use in companies, first quarter of 2025. Opinium for Amazon Ads, October 2025. UNEF, 2025 self-consumption report. Context figures only; they do not guarantee any result.
Because analysing properly takes time and a long list forces you to be shallow. We prefer a few, explained from the inside, and reviewed when conditions change.
No. No business guarantees results. What we do explain is where demand comes from, what it costs to start and what usually goes wrong, so the decision is yours and based on data.
It depends on your experience, the time you can put in and the money you are willing to risk. Tell us in the form and we will point you to the one that best fits your situation.
Not to start. Current tools let you build assistants and workflows without code. What you do need is a clear understanding of the client process before automating it.
It is a regulated trade: you need the electrical installer certification and must follow the low voltage regulations. Of the three, it asks for the most training and investment, and it also has the least competition.
Whenever the underlying data changes: demand, regulation or tool prices. If a business stops making sense, it comes off the list and we explain why.
Contact
Tell us about your situation: experience, time available and which of the three interests you. We reply within 24 working hours, with no obligation.